INSIDE TOURISM – EXPORT MATTERS

There has been some talk recently in the media about the 100% Pure New Zealand campaign – not as its effectiveness as a marketing campaign or how can we be 100% Middle Earth when we are at the bottom of the world (or the top depending on your perspective) but should we use a campaign slogan of 100% Pure in regards to our environmental status?

The 100% Pure New Zealand campaign was first delivered to the world in 1999 and I remember with excitement the range of opportunities the 100% Pure destination marketing campaign presented to different operators.

‘100% Pure New Zealand’ tells the story of how our landscape, people and activities combine to deliver a visitor experience that is unique to New Zealand. It is a tourism marketing campaign that has proven very adaptable across all markets and media. The statement is multidimensional – it has been used as 100% pure relaxation, 100% pure welcome, 100% pure adrenalin, 100% pure luxury, 100% pure you, etc. – all connected back to the core premise of 100% Pure New Zealand.

In Tourism New Zealand’s 2012 international visitor survey, our landscapes and natural scenery got an overall rating of 9.5 out of 10 – the highest rating in the survey. 8 out of 10 international visitors say that the environmental practices of the New Zealand tourism industry are better than in other countries – and that overall the New Zealand environment is being managed sustainably.  In fact not only have we won the best destination marketing campaign for the 100% Middle Earth as per the World Travel Awards 2012, TNZ and the 100% campaign have won numerous other awards over the period of 13 years the campaign has been operating.

100% Pure is not an environmental or ‘clean and green’ claim.  Tourism operators in New Zealand are responsible caregivers of the environment and are proud to share with our visitors their commitment to being as sustainable as possible. More than 1,000 New Zealand tourism businesses have met the strict criteria and hold an Enviro Award status and on an international scale this represents one of the largest clusters of recognised sustainable tourism providers. Our partnership with DOC (Department of Conservation) is a great example of working between the private and public sectors both via the concession and the conservation programmes.

While the media and general public are at liberty to make comment re the 100% Pure New Zealand campaign, the literal translation of 100% pure has been taken too literally and the evidence produced less scientific and more of a ‘gestimate’. Can we do better with our sustainability and environmental position? Yes of course but for the media to portray the country as an environmental disaster is potentially more damaging to the future of our tourism export receipts than the high dollar.

While I appreciate there is a spectrum of opinion re the 100% Pure New Zealand campaign, let’s make sure the discussion is around its effectiveness in marketing New Zealand rather than an ad  hoc environmental score card.